QuickToPrint

QuickToPrint / Comparison

QuickToPrint vs manual print sourcing

Manual print sourcing often spreads RFQs, supplier replies, files, prices, and follow-up across email, chat, and spreadsheets. QuickToPrint keeps the workflow connected.

Request accessSee the workflow

Manual sourcing problem

Manual quote collection gets messy before the supplier is chosen

The problem is rarely only the print method. It is the scattered handling of briefs, replies, files, price notes, and award decisions.

When each supplier receives a slightly different email, quote comparison becomes harder before the first price arrives.

Teams then copy numbers into spreadsheets, chase clarifications in separate threads, and restart the conversation after the supplier is awarded.

Workflow comparison

Where QuickToPrint changes the RFQ process

QuickToPrint gives buyer and supplier teams one operational record for the sourcing work instead of forcing every step through disconnected tools.

CriteriaManual sourcingQuickToPrint workflow
BriefingThe buyer repeats the job brief across email, chat, and files.The buyer creates one structured RFQ with garment, quantity, artwork, timing, and notes.
Supplier repliesReplies arrive in inconsistent formats and need manual cleanup.Supplier replies stay closer to the same request, making review easier.
Quote comparisonTeams rebuild the comparison in spreadsheets and side notes.Price, lead time, assumptions, and notes stay tied to the sourcing record.
Award follow-upAfter award, the production conversation often restarts without full context.Awarded follow-up remains connected to the RFQ and supplier decision.

Better way

A clearer way to move from supplier shortlist to awarded job

The goal is not to remove supplier relationships. The goal is to keep the commercial and operational trail readable as the job moves forward.

  1. Step 1

    Brief once

    Create the RFQ once with the details suppliers need to price the same job.

  2. Step 2

    Compare in context

    Review replies against the same request instead of rebuilding the quote set manually.

  3. Step 3

    Keep follow-up connected

    Move from award to follow-up without losing the sourcing record that explains the decision.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they launch

Does QuickToPrint replace supplier relationships?

No. QuickToPrint helps buyers and suppliers keep the RFQ, quote, award, and follow-up workflow clearer. It does not replace the production relationship.

Why is this better than spreadsheets?

Spreadsheets can compare numbers, but they do not keep files, messages, supplier context, award decisions, and follow-up attached to the same job record.

Is QuickToPrint only for large buying teams?

No. It is useful anywhere teams want a clearer record of the brief, supplier replies, award decision, and next steps.

QuickToPrint vs Manual Print Sourcing | RFQs Without Spreadsheet Chaos